Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 16.801
Filtrar
1.
Rural Remote Health ; 24(2): 8572, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632695

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples (First Nations Australians) living in remote communities are hospitalised with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) at three times the rate of non-First Nations Australians. The Torres Strait in tropical northern Australia has a highly dispersed population mainly comprising First Nations Australians. This study aimed to define the health service utilisation and health system costs associated with SSTIs in the Torres Strait and to improve the quality of regional healthcare delivery. METHODS: The research team conducted a retrospective, de-identified audit of health records for a 2-year period, 2018-2019. The aim was to define health service utilisation, episodes of outpatient care, emergency department care, inpatient care and aeromedical retrieval services for SSTIs. RESULTS: Across 2018 - 2019, there were 3509 outpatient episodes of care for SSTIs as well as 507 emergency department visits and 100 hospitalisations. For individuals with an SSTI, the mean outpatient clinic episode cost $240; the mean emergency department episode cost $400.85, the mean inpatient episode cost $8403.05 while an aeromedical retrieval service cost $18,670. The total costs to the health system for all services accessed for SSTI management was $6,169,881 per year, 3% of the total annual health service budget. CONCLUSION: Healthcare costs associated with SSTIs in the Torres Strait are substantial. The implementation of effective preventative and primary care interventions may enable resources to be reallocated to address other health priorities in the Torres Strait.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde do Indígena , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Dermatopatias Infecciosas , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Humanos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Povos Aborígenes Australianos e Ilhéus do Estreito de Torres , Atenção à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 85: 163-170, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37926052

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that racial and ethnic minorities have increased emergency department visit rates, despite being established with a primary care provider. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, ED visits without hospital admission in a 12-month period among patients with a new primary care provider-issued diagnosis of depression were assessed. Electronic medical record (EMR) data was obtained from 47 family medicine clinics in a large Michigan-based healthcare system. General linear regression models with Poisson distribution were used to predict frequency of ED visits. RESULTS: A total of 4159 patients were included in the analyses. In multivariable analyses, Black / African American race was associated with an additional 0.90 (95% CI 0.64, 1.16) ED visits and American Indian or Alaska Native race was associated with an additional 1.39 (95% CI 0.92, 1.87) ED visits compared to White or Caucasians (null value 0). These risks were only exceeded by patients who received a prescription for a typical antipsychotic drug agent. CONCLUSION: Despite being established patients at primary care providers and having follow-up encounters, Black / African American and American Indian or Alaska Native patients with depression were considerably more likely to seek ED treatment compared to White/Caucasian patients with depression.


Assuntos
Depressão , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Depressão/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca , Brancos , Grupos Raciais
3.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1192748, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900019

RESUMO

Background: County-level vaccination barriers (sociodemographic barriers, limited healthcare system resources, healthcare accessibility barriers, irregular healthcare seeking behaviors, history of low vaccination) may partially explain COVID-19 vaccination intentions among U.S. adults. This study examined whether county-level vaccination barriers varied across racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. and were associated with willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, this study assessed whether these associations differed across racial/ethnic groups. Methods: This study used data from the REACH-US study, a large online survey of U.S. adults (N = 5,475) completed from January 2021-March 2021. County-level vaccination barriers were measured using the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. Ordinal logistic regression estimated associations between race/ethnicity and county-level vaccination barriers and between county-level vaccination barriers and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Models adjusted for covariates (age, gender, income, education, political ideology, health insurance, high-risk chronic health condition). Multigroup analysis estimated whether associations between barriers and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine differed across racial/ethnic groups. Results: American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino ELP [English Language Preference (ELP); Spanish Language Preference (SLP)], and Multiracial adults were more likely than White adults to live in counties with higher overall county-level vaccination barriers [Adjusted Odd Ratios (AORs):1.63-3.81]. Higher county-level vaccination barriers were generally associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, yet associations were attenuated after adjusting for covariates. Trends differed across barriers and racial/ethnic groups. Higher sociodemographic barriers were associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (AOR:0.78, 95% CI:0.64-0.94), whereas higher irregular care-seeking behavior was associated with greater willingness to receive the vaccine (AOR:1.20, 95% CI:1.04-1.39). Greater history of low vaccination was associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among Black/African American adults (AOR:0.55, 95% CI:0.37-0.84), but greater willingness to receive the vaccine among American Indian/Alaska Native and Hispanic/Latino ELP adults (AOR:1.90, 95% CI:1.10-3.28; AOR:1.85, 95% CI:1.14-3.01). Discussion: Future public health emergency vaccination programs should include planning and coverage efforts that account for structural barriers to preventive healthcare and their intersection with sociodemographic factors. Addressing structural barriers to COVID-19 treatment and preventive services is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality in future infectious disease outbreaks.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Raciais , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 27(7): 32-42, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742332

RESUMO

Cervical cancer (CC) is the second leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among Nigerian women. Although screening is a cost-effective strategy for reducing its burden, uptake remains sub-optimal. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 514 sexually active women aged ≥25 years in Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria using a semi-structured interviewer administered questionnaire. Mean age of respondents was 38.4±11.6years. 246(46.9%) had good knowledge of CC screening while 268(51.2%) had poor knowledge. Religion (aOR:1.8 [95% CI: 1.1 - 3.1]), location (aOR:1.2 [95% CI: 1.2 - 3.4) and number of children (aOR:2.3 [95% CI: 1.3 - 3.9]) were predictors for screening. Poor access routes to health facilities (aOR:0.5 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9]), high cost of screening (aOR:0.4 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9]), unaware of screening centers (aOR:0.4 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9]) and long waiting hours (aOR:0.5 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9) were identified environmental predictors. Fear of positive diagnosis/stigma (aOR:0.3 [95% CI: 0.1 - 0.9]), unacceptable touch (aOR:0.2 [95% CI: 0.1 - 0.8), deficiency in awareness programs (aOR:0.3 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.7]), and not aware of appropriate screening age (aOR:0.1 [95% CI: 0.1 - 0.4]) were identified psychosocial predictors. This study highlights the need to intensify enlightenment programs, subsidize screening services, and encourage community screening.


Assuntos
População Negra , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Negra/etnologia , População Negra/psicologia , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 50(2): 157-167, 2023 02 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37677801

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe cancer screening characteristics and better understand individual-, environmental-, and organizational-level barriers of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. . SAMPLE & SETTING: This study was conducted using a combined sample from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national dataset from 2014 and 2016. METHODS & VARIABLES: Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis tests were performed to determine whether relationships existed between SGM status and demographics. RESULTS: Black respondents or those who reported their race as other, were female, had some college or technical school or more, and had healthcare coverage were less likely to present for cancer screening. SGM respondents who were in good or better health; were unmarried; were aged 18-44 years or 45-55 years; or were Asian, Native American, or Hawaiian, or reported their race as other, had higher odds of screening for cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Disparities in cancer screening among SGM populations are not well documented. These findings will inform structured education and preventative interventions to improve screening participation among SGM populations.


Assuntos
Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Asiático , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca , Grupos Raciais , Escolaridade , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde
7.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 44(8): 1754-1762, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535077

RESUMO

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth anomaly in the US. Research shows lost-to-follow-up trends and racial disparities in healthcare use. This study examines racial differences in healthcare use among Medicaid-covered children with CHD. Using 2010-2019 claims data from a pediatric Medicaid Accountable Care Organization, 960 Black and White children with complex CHD and ≥ 3 years of continuous Medicaid coverage were identified. Three cohorts were constructed (starting age: < 1-year-olds, 1-5-year-olds, 6-15-year-olds) and followed for 3 years. Multivariate analysis assessed annual healthcare use (cardiology, primary care, emergency department) by race, adjusting for patient and provider covariates. Overall, 51% of patients had an annual cardiology visit, and 54% had an annual primary care visit. Among the 1-5-year-old cohort, Black children were predicted to be 13% less likely to have an annual cardiology visit compared to their White counterparts (p = 0.001). Older Black children were predicted to be more likely to have a primary care visit compared to their White counterparts. Nearly half of Medicaid-enrolled children with complex CHD did not receive recommended cardiology care. Young Black children were less likely to receive an annual cardiac visit, while older Black children were more likely to receive primary care. While the percentage with an annual cardiac visit was low, the majority had seen a cardiologist within the 3-year window, suggesting these children are still receiving cardiology care, if less frequently than recommended. Opportunities exist for cardiology and primary care to collaborate to ensure patients receive timely recommended care.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Medicaid , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Atenção à Saúde , Cardiopatias Congênitas/terapia , Estados Unidos , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Adolescente , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 29(7): 825-834, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404066

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of severe asthma and severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) is significant. Updated assessments of health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost are needed given the increase in treatment options and updates to guidelines in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To describe all-cause and asthma-related HCRU and costs among patients with SUA vs patients with nonsevere asthma in the United States using real-world data. METHODS: MarketScan administrative claims databases were used to select adults with persistent asthma for this retrospective analysis between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. Asthma severity status was defined using the Global Initiative for Asthma step 4/5 criteria (index is the earliest date qualifying patients as severe or randomly assigned for nonsevere patients). Patients with SUA were a subset of the severe cohort meeting the following criteria: those who were hospitalized with asthma as the primary diagnosis or had at least 2 emergency department or outpatient visits with an asthma diagnosis and a steroid burst within 7 days. HCRU, costs (allcause and asthma-related defined as medical claims with an asthma diagnosis and pharmacy claims for asthma treatment), work loss, and indirect costs due to absenteeism and short-term disability (STD) were compared between patients with SUA, severe, and nonsevere asthma. Outcomes were reported during a fixed 12-month post-index period using chi-square and t-tests where appropriate. RESULTS: 533,172 patients with persistent asthma were identified (41.9% [223,610]) severe and 58.1% [309,562] nonsevere). Of the severe patients, 17.6% (39,380) had SUA. The mean (SD) all-cause total health care costs were significantly higher in patients with SUA ($23,353 [$40,817]) and severe asthma ($18,554 [$36,147]) compared with those with nonsevere asthma ($16,177 [$37,897], P < 0.001 vs nonsevere asthma). The results were consistent for asthma-related costs. In addition, although patients with severe asthma made up 41.9% of the total study population, they contributed disproportionately higher costs (60.5%) to the total asthma-related direct costs, with the effect more evident among patients with SUA (7.4% of study population contributed 17.7% of the total asthma-related costs). For the subset of patients with asthma with workplace absenteeism, patients with SUA lost more time from work (259.3 vs 236.2 hours lost, P = 0.002; 7.8 vs 5.3 STD days, P < 0.001), and had higher corresponding indirect costs ($5,944 vs $5,415, P = 0.002 for absenteeism related; $856 vs $582, P < 0.001 for STD related) compared with patients with nonsevere asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SUA have significantly higher asthma-related economic burden compared with patients with nonsevere asthma and contribute a disproportionally higher percentage of asthma-related costs. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Amgen and AstraZeneca. The design and analysis for this study was conducted primarily by Merative. Amgen and AstraZeneca provided funding to support protocol development, data analysis, and manuscript development activities associated with this study. Dr Burnette is on the advisory board and a consultant for GSK, a consultant and member of the advisory boards and speakers' bureaus of Sanofi, Genzyme, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, and Amgen Inc. Dr Wang, Dr Rane, Dr Lindsley, and Dr Llanos are employees and shareholders of Amgen Inc. Dr Chung and Dr Ambrose are employees and shareholders of AstraZeneca. Ms Princic and Ms Park are employees of Merative, which received funding from Amgen to conduct this study.


Assuntos
Asma , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 463, 2023 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37344832

RESUMO

Anxiety levels in medical students have been reported as higher than the aged-matched general population, yet medical students are less likely to seek care for mental health issues. Medical students carry high levels of self-stigma about their own mental health and fear the negative consequences of seeking care. The purpose of this study was to examine the student population at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville (UofSC SOMG) for anxiety levels and determine the self-stigma attitudes this population carries. UofSC SOMG students were surveyed using the GAD7, questions about mental health stigma, and open-ended questions on barriers to mental health care in medical students. Anxiety levels were compared to student responses. 31% of students reported moderate-severe anxiety levels. Stigma was the most frequently listed barrier to care, however, students with moderate-severe anxiety were more likely to report cost as a barrier to care than students with minimal anxiety levels. Despite free and accessible mental health care, medical students at UofSC SOMG still have anxiety at rates higher than the general population. Future work should help to provide interventions to the barriers of care, so medical students can better utilize mental health care resources.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudantes de Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Faculdades de Medicina , Autoimagem , South Carolina/epidemiologia , Estereotipagem , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
CMAJ Open ; 11(3): E560-E568, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37369522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized. We aimed to identify barriers to use of PrEP and strategies that may facilitate its uptake. METHODS: Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, aged 19 years or older and living in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada, completed a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020. Participants who met Canadian PrEP guideline criteria and were not already using PrEP identified relevant barriers and which strategies would make them more likely to start PrEP. We described the barriers and strategies separately for Ontario and BC. RESULTS: Of 1527 survey responses, 260 respondents who never used PrEP and met criteria for PrEP were included. In Ontario, the most common barriers were affordability (43%) and concern about adverse effects (42%). In BC, the most common reasons were concern about adverse effects (41%) and not feeling at high enough risk (36%). In Ontario, preferred strategies were short waiting time (63%), the health care provider informing about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (62%), and a written step-by-step guide (60%). In BC, strategies were short waiting time (68%), people speaking publicly about PrEP (68%), and the health care provider counselling about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (64%), adverse effects of PrEP (65%) and how well PrEP works (62%). INTERPRETATION: Concern about adverse effects and not self-identifying as having high risk for HIV were common barriers, and shorter waiting times may increase PrEP uptake. In Ontario, the findings suggested lack of affordability, whereas in BC, strategies involving health care providers were valued.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Ontário/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37372738

RESUMO

Ensuring a healthy lifestyle for the increasing number of Vietnamese migrants living in Japan is a key public health issue, including infectious disease responses such as tuberculosis (TB). To develop risk communication in relation to the TB response, this study aimed to explore the health issues and health-related behaviors of Vietnamese migrants living in Japan using a mixed method. A survey was conducted on Vietnam-born migrants, aged 18 years and over, in Tokyo. The survey consisted of questions on the following components: (1) demographics; (2) health-related issues and behavior; and (3) health-seeking behavior, information, and communication. A total 165 participants participated in the survey. The majority of the participants were young adults. 13% of the participants responded that they were concerned about their health. Moreover, 22% and 7% of the participants reported weight loss and respiratory symptoms, respectively. 44% of the participants answered they had no one to consult about their health in Japan when they needed it, and 58% answered they had no awareness of any Vietnamese-language health consultation services. Logistic regression analysis revealed that people who contact family members living in Vietnam or overseas using social networking services (SNSs) when they needed to consult someone about their health (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-24.43) were more likely to present with one or more of the typical TB symptoms, compared to those who did not consult someone in this manner. Current smokers (OR = 3.08, 95% CI 1.15-8.23) were more likely to have health problems compared to non-smokers. The key informant interviews revealed that individual factors, the health system, and socio-environmental factors may hinder Vietnamese migrants' health-seeking and health-information-seeking behaviors in Japan. TB risk communication approaches for migrants need to be developed considering their health-related behaviors while addressing their health needs.


Assuntos
Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , População do Sudeste Asiático , Migrantes , Tuberculose , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Japão/epidemiologia , Idioma , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População do Sudeste Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/terapia , Vietnã/etnologia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Health Serv Res ; 58(6): 1189-1197, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37076113

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether expanded access to Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care increased overall utilization or induced a shift from other payers to VA for emergency care among VA enrollees. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This study included all emergency department (ED) encounters in 2019 from hospitals in the state of New York. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a difference-in-differences analysis comparing VA enrollees to the general population before and after the implementation of the Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act in June 2019. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We included all ED visits with individuals aged 30 or older at the time of the encounter. Individuals were considered eligible for the policy change if they were enrolled with VA at the beginning of 2019. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of the 5,577,199 ED visits in the sample, 4.9% (n = 253,799) were made by VA enrollees. Of these, 44.9% of visits were paid by Medicare, 32.8% occurred in VA facilities, and 7% were paid by private health insurance. There was a 6.4% (2.91 percentage points; std. error = 0.18; p < 0.01) decrease in the proportion of ED visits paid by Medicare among VA enrollees relative to the general population after the implementation of the MISSION Act in June 2019. This decrease was larger for ED visits with a subsequent inpatient admission (-8.4%; 4.87 percentage points; std. error = 0.33; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant change in the total volume of ED visits (0.06%; std. error = 0.08; p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging a novel dataset, we demonstrate that MISSION Act implementation coincided with a shift in the financing of non-VA ED visits from Medicare to VA without any increase in overall ED utilization. These findings have important implications for VA health care financing and delivery.


Assuntos
Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Veteranos , Humanos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Seguro Saúde , Medicare , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , New York , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto
13.
JAMA Pediatr ; 177(5): 461-471, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939728

RESUMO

Importance: Children with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic conditions and high health needs and may experience fragmented care. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a structured complex care program, Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO), with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial used a waitlist variation for randomizing patients from 12 complex care clinics in Ontario, Canada, over 2 years. The study was conducted from December 2016 to June 2021. Participants were identified based on complex care clinic referral and randomly allocated into an intervention group, seen at the next available clinic appointment, or a control group that was placed on a waitlist to receive the intervention after 12 months. Intervention: Assignment of a nurse practitioner-pediatrician dyad partnering with families in a structured complex care clinic to provide intensive care coordination and comprehensive plans of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization, were service delivery indicators from the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care that scored (1) coordination of care among health care professionals, (2) coordination of care between health care professionals and families, and (3) utility of care planning tools. Secondary outcomes included child and parent health outcomes and child health care system utilization and cost. Results: Of 144 participants randomized, 141 had complete health administrative data, and 139 had complete baseline surveys. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 29 months (9-102); 83 (60%) were male. At 12 months, scores for utility of care planning tools improved in the intervention group compared with the waitlist group (adjusted odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 3.9-21.9; P < .001), with no difference between groups for the other 2 co-primary outcomes. There were no group differences for secondary outcomes of child outcomes, parent outcomes, and health care system utilization and cost. At 24 months, when both groups were receiving the intervention, no primary outcome differences were observed. Total health care costs in the second year were lower for the intervention group (median, CAD$17 891; IQR, 6098-61 346; vs CAD$37 524; IQR, 9338-119 547 [US $13 415; IQR, 4572-45 998; vs US $28 136; IQR, 7002-89 637]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: The CCKO program improved the perceived utility of care planning tools but not other outcomes at 1 year. Extended evaluation periods may be helpful in assessing pediatric complex care interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928757.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Ontário , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(5): 479-489, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854988

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the disparate human papillomavirus (HPV) infection rates among sexually active Black young adults, HPV vaccine uptake remains low among this population. This study aimed to explore HPV beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge among Black young adults and provide recommendations on ways to improve vaccine uptake. METHODS: We used a mixed-method, convergent design to conduct five focus groups and administered a 40-item electronic survey that was developed with health belief model (HBM) constructs. We assessed HPV and vaccine knowledge, barriers, and attitudes toward vaccination. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and bivariate methods. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Results were integrated to obtain a better understanding of the topic. RESULTS: Forty individuals participated in the study. The mean age was 22.2 ± 4.5 years and 55% identified as African immigrants. Integrated data revealed themes mapped to relevant HBM constructs. Almost one third (32.5%) of participants were unaware of their susceptibility to HPV infection and its severity. From focus group discussions, the majority (75%) believed that vaccines are beneficial. Major cues to action include promoting HPV vaccine uptake via community wide informational sessions, provider recommendation, and social and mass media campaigns. CONCLUSION: Barriers to vaccine uptake, limited HPV knowledge, and lack of vaccine recommendation are important factors contributing to low vaccine uptake among Black young adults. Interventions to decrease barriers to HPV vaccination, increase HPV knowledge, address misconceptions, and unfavorable beliefs are needed to promote HPV vaccine uptake.


Assuntos
População Negra , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/etnologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/psicologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , África/etnologia , População Negra/psicologia , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
J Infect ; 86(4): 369-375, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796679

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a growing public health problem with an average of 361 cases notified annually to Germany's passive surveillance system since 2001. We aimed to assess clinical manifestations and identify covariates associated with severity. METHODS: We included cases notified 2018-2020 in a prospective cohort study and collected data with telephone interviews, questionnaires to general practitioners, and hospital discharge summaries. Covariates' causal associations with severity were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for variables identified via directed acyclic graphs. RESULTS: Of 1220 eligible cases, 581 (48%) participated. Of these, 97.1% were not (fully) vaccinated. TBE was severe in 20.3% of cases (children: 9.1%, ≥70-year-olds: 48.6%). Routine surveillance data underreported the proportion of cases with central nervous system involvement (56% vs. 84%). Ninety percent required hospitalization, 13.8% intensive care, and 33.4% rehabilitation. Severity was most notably associated with age (odds ratio (OR): 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.05), hypertension (OR: 2.27, 95%CI: 1.37-3.75), and monophasic disease course (OR: 1.67, 95%CI: 1.08-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantial TBE burden and health service utilization, suggesting that awareness of TBE severity and vaccine preventability should be increased. Knowledge of severity-associated factors may help inform patients' decision to get vaccinated.


Assuntos
Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos , Criança , Humanos , Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/complicações , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/epidemiologia , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/patologia , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/prevenção & controle , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinas Virais , Estudos de Coortes , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Feminino , Gravidade do Paciente , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 37(4): 373-380, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764888

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the perspectives of parents who had delayed and refused human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for their children, even when it was discussed or recommended by a health care provider, and to identify the factors related to vaccine hesitancy. METHOD: Twenty predominantly African American parents of children aged 11-17 years were recruited from various community clinics and organizations to participate in focus groups about their decision-making regarding HPV vaccination. Using deductive content analysis and the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix, we describe their perspectives and influences on vaccination decision-making. RESULTS: Multiple reasons emerged, which included concerns about the age of children, perceived discrimination and mistrust based on race and socioeconomic status, and vaccine safety. DISCUSSION: Findings support the development of targeted interventions that address vaccine safety concerns, mistrust, patient-provider communication, and parent education about the benefits of HPV vaccination.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Pais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Hesitação Vacinal , Criança , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/etnologia , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Poder Familiar/etnologia , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Segurança do Paciente , Confiança
17.
Obes Surg ; 33(4): 1297-1299, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36811749

RESUMO

Despite the greater prevalence of obesity, African American (AA) adults represent a minority of bariatric surgery patients. The aim of this study was to determine variables associated with attrition among AA patients seeking bariatric surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of AA patients with obesity referred for surgery and who initiated the preoperative work-up as per insurance requirements. The sample was then divided between those undergoing surgery and those who did not receive surgery. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male patients (OR 0.53 95% CI 0.28-0.98) and those with public insurance (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37 - 0.83) were significantly less likely to undergo surgery. The use of telehealth was strongly associated with receiving surgery (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.36 - 5.29). Our results might help developing targeted strategies to reduce attrition rates among AA patients with obesity seeking bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Obesidade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/etnologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/etnologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Am J Prev Med ; 64(5): 734-741, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690543

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Focusing on subpopulations that express the intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccination but are unvaccinated may improve the yield of COVID-19 vaccination efforts. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 789,658 U.S. adults aged ≥18 years participated in the National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module from May 2021 to April 2022. The survey assessed respondents' COVID-19 vaccination status and intent by demographic characteristics (age, urbanicity, educational attainment, region, insurance, income, and race/ethnicity). This study compared composition and within-group estimates of those who responded that they definitely or probably will get vaccinated or are unsure (moveable middle) from the first and last month of data collection. RESULTS: Because vaccination uptake increased over the study period, the moveable middle declined among persons aged ≥18 years. Adults aged 18-39 years and suburban residents comprised most of the moveable middle in April 2022. Groups with the largest moveable middles in April 2022 included persons with no insurance (10%), those aged 18-29 years (8%), and those with incomes below poverty (8%), followed by non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (7%), non-Hispanic multiple or other race (6%), non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native persons (6%), non-Hispanic Black or African American persons (6%), those with below high school education (6%), those with high school education (5%), and those aged 30-39 years (5%). CONCLUSIONS: A sizable percentage of adults open to receiving COVID-19 vaccination remain in several demographic groups. Emphasizing engagement of persons who are unvaccinated in some racial/ethnic groups, aged 18-39 years, without health insurance, or with lower income may reach more persons open to vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 18(1): 5, 2023 01 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36641441

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study identified patient profiles in terms of their quality of outpatient care use, associated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and adverse outcomes based on frequent emergency department (ED) use, hospitalization, and death from medical causes. METHODS: A cohort of 18,215 patients with substance-related disorders (SRD) recruited in addiction treatment centers was investigated using Quebec (Canada) health administrative databases. A latent class analysis was produced, identifying three profiles of quality of outpatient care use, while multinomial and logistic regressions tested associations with patient characteristics and adverse outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Profile 1 patients (47% of the sample), labeled "Low outpatient service users", received low quality of care. They were mainly younger, materially and socially deprived men, some with a criminal history. They had more recent SRD, mainly polysubstance, and less mental disorders (MD) and chronic physical illnesses than other Profiles. Profile 2 patients (36%), labeled "Moderate outpatient service users", received high continuity and intensity of care by general practitioners (GP), while the diversity and regularity in their overall quality of outpatient service was moderate. Compared with Profile 1, they  were older, less likely to be unemployed or to live in semi-urban areas, and most had common MD and chronic physical illnesses. Profile 3 patients (17%), labeled "High outpatient service users", received more intensive psychiatric care and higher quality of outpatient care than other Profiles. Most Profile 3 patients lived alone or were single parents, and fewer lived in rural areas or had a history of homelessness, versus Profile 1 patients. They were strongly affected by MD, mostly serious MD and personality disorders. Compared with Profile 1, Profile 3 had more frequent ED use and hospitalizations, followed by Profile 2. No differences in death rates emerged among the profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent ED use and hospitalization were strongly related to patient clinical and sociodemographic profiles, and the quality of outpatient services received to the severity of their conditions. Outreach strategies more responsive to patient needs may include motivational interventions and prevention of risky behaviors for Profile 1 patients, collaborative GP-psychiatrist care for Profile 2 patients, and GP care and intensive specialized treatment for Profile 3 patients.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Masculino , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/mortalidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Geral/normas , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...